Criminal Defense Case Results in Austin, TX

Real outcomes from real cases. See how we fight for our clients.

Explore AI Summary

CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Possession of a Controlled Substance (Felony)

Location

Travis County, 390th District Court

Allegations

Our client was charged with felony possession after officers reported finding a controlled substance. We obtained the discovery, including reports, video, and lab documentation. Our review focused on whether the seizure was lawful and if the evidence could be reliably tied to the client. We raised these deficiencies with the prosecutor and made clear we were prepared to litigate suppression and chain of custody issues. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: James Fletcher
DEFERRED ADJUDICATION

Charge

Theft (Felony)

Location

Williamson County, 277th Judicial District Court

Allegations

State investigators accused our client of felony theft tied to caregiver timesheets, alleging they were paid for services not actually provided over an extended period. The client contacted us before surrendering. We coordinated the surrender and obtained the agency's billing logs and time records. Our review showed overlapping caregiving by family members and agency instructions that made the clock in and out process ambiguous, supporting a lack of intent. We leveraged those issues and the client's cooperation to negotiate deferred probation, keeping a conviction off the record.

Result

Deferred Adjudication

Oct 2025 Attorney: James Fletcher
CHARGES REDUCED

Charge

DWI - Second Offense

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

After an evening out, our client was stopped following an improper turn at a traffic signal and arrested for a second DWI. They completed field sobriety tests, and a breath test taken later registered just above the legal limit. We obtained the dash and bodycam video and showed that the officer's report overstated impairment and did not align with what the footage revealed. The client also was not wearing prescribed glasses, a factor that can affect those tests. We pressed the state on these issues and negotiated a reduction to a lesser charge, avoiding second-offense penalties.

Result

Charges Reduced

Oct 2025 Attorney: Matthew Pospisil
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Interference with Public Duties

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #1

Allegations

During a service attempt at a residence, a dispute escalated and someone called police. Responding officers issued conflicting orders, then arrested the client for interference when the client questioned what to do and tried to explain their role. We obtained bodycam and client-shot video showing mixed commands and no effort to hinder the investigation. We compiled these inconsistencies and challenged whether the elements of the offense were met. The prosecutor dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Bell County, CC3

Allegations

After a stop for speeding, the client admitted to drinking and was arrested for DWI. Due to significant leg injuries and the use of crutches, only the HGN eye test was attempted. There was no breath test and no blood draw. We gathered documentation of the injuries and scrutinized the officer’s report, emphasizing the lack of standardized field tests and any chemical evidence. We challenged whether those limited observations could meet the burden of proof. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Andromeda Vega Rubio
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, 428th District Court

Allegations

The client was on felony deferred probation when a traffic stop for an equipment issue led to new drug allegations, which the state cited to seek revocation. We closely reviewed the probation terms and the claimed violations, focusing on the legality of the stop and whether consent to search was actually given. We gathered documentation of treatment efforts and meeting attendance to demonstrate progress and compliance. After we highlighted these issues in negotiations, the prosecution dismissed the motion.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Misdemeanor Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Williamson County, CCL2

Allegations

Probation filed to revoke after the client missed required check-ins and the ignition interlock showed a period of inactivity while the client was in inpatient mental health treatment. A warrant issued and a hearing was set. We collected hospital and rehab records, discharge summaries, and proof of ongoing counseling, then verified the timeline against supervision logs and device data. We met with the prosecutor to explain the circumstances and the absence of new offenses, and prepared to argue for continuation of supervision. The state agreed revocation was not warranted, and the motion was dismissed.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Dan Dworin
PROBATION

Charge

Assault Causing Bodily Injury to a Family Member (Class A Misdemeanor)

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

The case stemmed from a turbulent breakup where the complainant reported that the client pinched her during two separate encounters, producing photos that showed redness and a small bruise. Police relied heavily on her statements. We obtained the investigative materials and scrutinized the interviews and timeline. At the same time, we built mitigation, including character letters, proof of ongoing education and work, completion of a counseling class, and community service. We presented this to the prosecutor and negotiated straight probation.

Result

Probation

Oct 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Criminal Trespass (Misdemeanor)

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

The client was accused of criminal trespass after showing up at a family residence where police said the client had been told not to return. We pulled the case file and spoke with the reporting party to understand what actually happened. The complainant later told us they did not want to pursue the matter. We presented that stance, together with context about the family situation, to the prosecutor. With no complainant support and limited proof, the state dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Matthew Pospisil
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

False Report to Induce Emergency Response

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

The case stemmed from a series of calls where our client told authorities a family member was in immediate danger. He was charged with making a false report to trigger an emergency response. We gathered contextual materials, including prior safety complaints and evaluation records, to show he acted out of genuine concern rather than an intent to deceive. We emphasized the state’s burden to prove he knowingly provided false information and pressed those weaknesses in negotiations. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Matthew Pospisil
CHARGES REDUCED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Bastrop County, County Court at Law

Allegations

The client was found sitting in a parked car after an evening at a local venue when an officer illuminated the vehicle and initiated a welfare check. The officer requested field sobriety tests, and our client declined, noting they would not perform well. At the hospital, the officer sought a blood sample, and the paperwork reflected a refusal after unclear advisement. We pursued the body camera footage and scrutinized whether the statutory warnings were properly given and whether the initial detention was lawful. Confronted with these problems, the prosecution agreed to reduce the charge and we secured probation.

Result

Charges Reduced

Oct 2025 Attorney: James Fletcher
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Criminal Trespass (Misdemeanor)

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

The client was accused of misdemeanor criminal trespass after a relative reported they entered a residence during a period of apparent intoxication. We moved quickly to understand the dynamics of the situation and contacted the reporting party, who later indicated they did not want to pursue the matter. We presented that position to the prosecutor along with context about the relationship and the circumstances surrounding the incident, emphasizing weaknesses in proving unauthorized entry. The state dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Matthew Pospisil

Showing 733-744 of 1010 case results

Your Future Can't Wait

Every moment matters when facing criminal charges. Schedule a free case review now.